<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Showdown hopefully explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/showdown-hopefully-explained-98/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/showdown-hopefully-explained-98/</link>
	<description>Poker Information for the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:08:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Show me your f*cking cards &#124; Casino Texas Hold 'em</title>
		<link>http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/showdown-hopefully-explained-98/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Show me your f*cking cards &#124; Casino Texas Hold 'em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/?p=98#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>[...] to explain the method and etiquette of showdown order, this has already been explained excellently here, but what I mean, is the general pissing about that a lot of players seem to have to go through. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to explain the method and etiquette of showdown order, this has already been explained excellently here, but what I mean, is the general pissing about that a lot of players seem to have to go through. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev B</title>
		<link>http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/showdown-hopefully-explained-98/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/?p=98#comment-743</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dik9</title>
		<link>http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/showdown-hopefully-explained-98/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>dik9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/?p=98#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Number 4 is the best IMO, if you have paid to see someones cards on the river, if you use option 4 they must show first anyway, so you get to see, if done properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 4 is the best IMO, if you have paid to see someones cards on the river, if you use option 4 they must show first anyway, so you get to see, if done properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boydy</title>
		<link>http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/showdown-hopefully-explained-98/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Boydy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpokerinfo.co.uk/?p=98#comment-219</guid>
		<description>So which are you saying should be the correct one? I think No 4 is personally the best here. But at the end of the day, if I have paid someone off on the river, I would expect to see what I had paid for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which are you saying should be the correct one? I think No 4 is personally the best here. But at the end of the day, if I have paid someone off on the river, I would expect to see what I had paid for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
